Who this is for
Using your phone as a music source is now the norm for the vast majority of circumstances. This is especially true given the rise of streaming services. But using a phone for music can still be problematic in some cases, such as when you’re working out or going to the beach. https://salisbest.com/best-music-player-for-android. Until recently, the iPod Shuffle and Nano were the perfect fallback music players for most people, but Apple discontinued those devices in 201A small, inexpensive MPplayer loaded with your songs is the perfect option to keep your mind at ease and let you focus on your run, rest, or relaxation.

You can find some advanced MPplayers aimed at audiophiles looking to play their high-res files on the go, but our focus here is on more affordable and portable models. Even a cheap MPplayer should be able to handle the vast majority of audio files on most people’s computers.
Flaws but not dealbreakers
You have no way to add storage space, an option found in some less expensive competitors. But with 16 GB of internal memory (a little over 15 GB after preinstalled system software), this player can hold thousands of songs, depending on the file size, so we didn’t think that feature was crucial for the intended use.
The competition
The AGPTek A20S comes with a 16 GB microSD card and is expandable up to 64 GB. But within 30 minutes of our using it, one button became unresponsive—and shortly after, a second followed suit.
 FiiO makes some nice devices, and the X(2nd Generation) showed a lot of promise as the only high-resolution player that met our price limit. Unfortunately the touch-sensitive scroll wheel was buggy and inconsistent, and some menu features (like the Equalizer) didn’t work at all.

The Hotechs MPplayer strives to look like an early-generation iPod Nano, but that’s where the similarities stop. In our tests, the controls were anything but intuitive, and the button response was erratic.
The iPod Touch is the last iPod standing (RIP, Nano and Shuffle). But given its high cost and extensive feature set, you end up paying for a lot of features that you don’t need if you already have a smartphone.

Though it seems as if the iPod has been around forever, the device is actually only eight years old as of last week. Portable digital music players in general aren't much older, as the first clunky, hard-to-use, and expensive ones showed up in 199It's easy to forget that, prior to today's video-enabled iPod Nano and sleek Zune HD, state-of-the-art MPplayers were bulky and pricey devices with short battery lives, frustrating copy-protection schemes, and bad user interfaces.
In this slideshow we'll look back at some of the landmark devices and features in the evolution of the portable MPplayer, over the past decade.
Touchscreen Players
Samsung introduced the YP-Ptouchscreen MPplayer, which also had 16GB of storage and made extended use of Bluetooth connectivity; the latter feature allowed users to make and receive calls when they paired the YP-Pwith a Bluetooth-enabled phone.

In 1991, there were two available proposals that were assessed for an MPEG audio standard: MUSICAM (Masking pattern adapted Universal Subband Integrated Coding And Multiplexing) and ASPEC (Adaptive Spectral Perceptual Entropy Coding). The MUSICAM technique, proposed by Philips (Netherlands), CCETT (France), the Institute for Broadcast Technology (Germany), and Matsushita (Japan), was chosen due to its simplicity and error robustness, as well as for its high level of computational efficiency.
The MUSICAM format, based on sub-band coding, became the basis for the MPEG Audio compression format, incorporating, for example, its frame structure, header format, sample rates, etc.
While much of MUSICAM technology and ideas were incorporated into the definition of MPEG Audio Layer I and Layer II, the filter bank alone and the data structure based on 115samples framing (file format and byte oriented stream) of MUSICAM remained in the Layer III (MP3) format, as part of the computationally inefficient hybrid filter bank. Under the chairmanship of Professor Musmann of the Leibniz University Hannover, the editing of the standard was delegated to Leon van de Kerkhof (Netherlands), Gerhard Stoll (Germany), and Yves-François Dehery (France), who worked on Layer I and Layer II. ASPEC was the joint proposal of AT&T Bell Laboratories, Thomson Consumer Electronics, Fraunhofer Society and CNET..
Il n'y a pas de commentaire sur cette page. [Afficher commentaires/formulaire]